RE: Another process question

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I am convinced to ask for Info RFC 
(if they indeed still want to do it)

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf@cisco.com]
> Sent: donderdag 20 maart 2003 17:05
> To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
> Cc: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Iesg (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Another process question
> 
> 
> 
> On torsdag, mar 20, 2003, at 06:37 US/Pacific, Harald Tveit 
> Alvestrand 
> wrote:
> 
> > The good thing is that the overhead of those decisions was low.
> > The bad thing is that five years down the road, I have no 
> record I can 
> > find and point to saying "this is why we did it".
> 
> The ones we have done in apps area during my time has always been 
> attached with:
> 
>   - A discussion like this ;-)
>   - An informational RFC stating "why"
> 
> See for example RFC 3494.
> 
>      paf
>