Re: Shutting down WGs

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

historically WGs are not actually shut whle there are ID listed
as WG documents  (including IDs in teh RFC Ed queue)

but an AD saying that the IDs should be reclassified as individual
submissions (as Bert suggests) is just fine

Scott (the historian)

--------

>From iesg-admin@ietf.org  Sat Mar 22 14:59:58 2003
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "Iesg (E-mail)" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Shutting down WGs
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 20:59:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: iesg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: iesg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: iesg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <iesg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

I have one, which still has 8 I-Ds listed on their charter page.
But they are all expired. The youngest one is from June 2002.
So I guess I can just shut it down and the I-Ds will be removed.

The other one has one expired document, but also one that was just 
put in in Feb 2003. So it is new. But I did not see enough energy
and willingness to work on it in the WG. So can I as AD just 
declare that it should be reclassified as indivudual I-D 
(keeping the wg name?) ?

Thanks,
Bert