I realize that as an AD, I have to give up certain abilities, such as
the right to route email from Fleming directly to the bit-bucket. Am
I under any obligation to make it easy for him to annoy my boss? (Of
course, Fleming is quite capable of annoying many other AT&T people in
an attempt to find that information on his own, so it may be a tactical
issue of how many people I want involved. And Fleming has sued AT&T in
the past -- if you want to see smoke coming out of Bjarne Stoustrup's
ears, ask him about the suit, since he was one of the people heavily
involved. I don't think I need to comment on the technical merits of
the lawsuit....)
------- Forwarded Message
Message-ID: <0ca001c2f37b$798ce900$8500a8c0@repligate>
From: "Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
References: <20030326025649.834447B87@berkshire.research.att.com>
Subject: Re: declare wg closed....Re: meeting notes from San Francisco
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 03:38:35 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0
tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,
USER_AGENT_OE
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Who do you report to at AT&T ?
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
To: "Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@Ameritech.Net>
Cc: <harald@alvestrand.no>; <sra@hactrn.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: declare wg closed....Re: meeting notes from San Francisco
In message <0abe01c2f308$fd3608e0$8500a8c0@repligate>, "Jim Fleming"
writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
> declare wg closed.
>>
> ===================================
>
> As people are **Liberated** from the corrupt regimes of The Big Lie
> Society, they have to realize that the people behind those regimes do
> not go away, they simply run and hide and regroup and emerge
> again...if people are not always on guard
> and watchful...and ready to rise up when the tide of liars return in
> their att empt to
> replace the truth with their evil...which of course can never overcome
> the tru th...
Jim -- your postings to the IPR working group have repeatedly been
off-topic. Please stop. If you have something on-topic to say,
please post it. Attacks on the IESG, the IAB, and the Internet
Society -- even if justified, and (not suprisingly) I don't think
they are -- are off-topic for this list. If you continue your
off-topic postings, I (in consultation with the appropriate Area
Director) will bar you from the list. (Yes, I know that you're
repeatedly subscribing and unsubscribing.)
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)
------- End of Forwarded Message
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)