[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-atommib-rfc2558bis - Definitions of Managed Objects for the SONET/SDH Interface Type to Draft Standard
- To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-atommib-rfc2558bis - Definitions of Managed Objects for the SONET/SDH Interface Type to Draft Standard
- From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:50:53 -0500
- Cc: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
In message <200303282154.QAA20924@ietf.org>, IESG Secretary writes:
>
>Last Call to expire on: 2003-2-18
>
> Please return the full line with your position.
>
> Yes No-Objection Discuss * Abstain
>Allison Mankin [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ]
This is probably due to my ignorance of MIB construction, but...
Some items say "Supports read-only access" or "just read-only access
may be supported," which I assume means "this variable may be
implemented as read-only if you wish". I'm not thrilled with the
wording; I'm even more concerned that it's only specified for a few
items. Why, for example, isn't that true of ifConnectorPresent, which
is described as "Set to true(1)"?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)