See answers in []'s after each number request.
Regards,
Peter Ashwood-Smith
-----Original Message-----
From: IANA [mailto:iana@iana.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 12:59 PM
To: iesg@ietf.org
Cc: Ashwood-Smith, Peter [CAR:1A00:EXCH]; Paraschiv, Antonela [BL60:QW12:EXCH]; swallow@cisco.com; loa.andersson@utfors.se
Subject: RE: Last Call: Multi Protocol Label Switching Label Distribution Protocol Query Message Description to Proposed Standard
IESG:
This is a bit late...
The IANA has reviewed the following Internet-Draft which is in Last
Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-query-06.txt>, and has the following
comments with regards to the publication of this document:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will register the following in <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldp-namespaces>:
Message Types
Message Type
-------------------------------------- ----------
Query Message TBD IANA [ connection related space]
Query Reply Message TBD IANA [ connection related space]
Partial Query Reply Message TBD IANA [ connection related space]
TLV Types
TLV Type
-------------------------------------- ----------
Query TLV TBD IANA [ CR-LDP TLV space ]
Query Label TLV TBD IANA [ CR-LDP TLV space ]
Query Merge Flags TLV TBD IANA [ CR-LDP TLV space ]
Status Codes
Status Code Type
-------------------------------------- ----------
No LSP to query TBD IANA [ CR-LDP status code space ]
Ambiguous label value TBD IANA [ CR-LDP status code space ]
There are different ranges for different types in the ldp-namespaces registry. We would like the authors to clarify which range should each of these assignments be placed in.
Please respond to the IANA about our concerns with regards to this document. Failing to do so may cause delay of the approval and publication of your document.
Thank you.
Michelle S. Cotton
(on behalf of the IANA)