RE: Evaluation: draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-revok - Registration Revocation in Mobile IPv4 to Proposed Standard

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

>                     Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain  
> Bert Wijnen         [   ]     [ X ]       [   ]      [   ]

However, I do see (non-compliance with ID-NITS):

- citation in abstract

- Page 11:

           e.g. revoke: 10.1.1.128, prefixLen: 25 means all mobile nodes
           whose addresses fall within the range 10.1.1.128 - 10.1.1.254
           and revoke: 10.1.1.129, prefixLen: 25 has the same meaning,
           but revoke: 10.1.1.0, prefixLen:25 means all mobile nodes 
           whose addresses fall within the range 10.1.1.0 - 10.1.1.127.


           (e.g. revoke: 10.1.1.240, prefixLen: 28).

   and there is more of that on following page(s)

   ID-NITS says
     Addresses used in examples should prefer use of fully qualified
     domain names to literal IP addresses, and prefer use of example
     fqdn's such as foo.example.com to real-world fqdn's
     See RFC 2606 for example domain names that can be used
     There is also a range of IP addresses set aside for this purpose.
     These are 192.0.2.0/24 (see RFC 3330). Private addressess that
     would be used in the real world should be avoided in examples. 

- References not split