Re: draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-revok-05.txt

[Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>]

> I believe this one still needs an IANA Considerations
> section.  There are some TBAs by IANA.  I raised this 
> during last call.  Thoughts?

I thought they had forwarded you an update, but I guess not.

"Steven M. Glass" <Steven.Glass@Sun.COM> writes:


> From: "Steven M. Glass" <Steven.Glass@Sun.COM>
> To: mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> Cc: narten@us.ibm.com, Raj Patil <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>, gab@Sun.COM,
>    PRoberts@MEGISTO.com, madhavi Chandra <mchandra@cisco.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:05:48 -0500
> Subject: Registration Revocation: IANA Considerations section


>      Fellow WG members,

>      Submitted for your peer-review is this draft of the IANA 
> considerations section to be added to 
> draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-revok-05.txt as part of IETF last call.  Please 
> respond with any comments to myself, and of-course the alais.

>                                Cheers,
>                                    Steve


>      IANA Considerations

>      This document defines an additional set of messages between the 
> home and foreign agent specific to the services being provided to the 
> same mobile node, or sub-set of mobile nodes.  To ensure correct 
> interoperation based on this specification, IANA must reserve values in 
> the mobile-ip number space for two new message types, and a single new 
> extension value.

>      New Message Types:

>      Registration Revocation:  A new Mobile-IP control message, using 
> UDP port 434, the value for which needs to be taken from the same 
> number space as Mobile-IP Registration Request (Type = 1), and 
> Mobile-IP Registration Reply (Type = 3).

>      Registration Revocation Acknowledgment: A new Mobile-IP control 
> message, using UDP port 434, the value for which needs to be taken from 
> the same number space as Mobile-IP Registration Request (Type = 1), and 
> Mobile-IP Registration Reply (Type = 3).


>      New Extension Values:

>      Revocation Extension:  A Mobile-IP Extension, appended to a 
> Registration Request, or Registration Reply.  The value should be 
> derived from the extension number space, and MUST be in the 'skippable' 
> (128 - 255) range as defined in RFC3344.

>      Prefix Length Extension: this extension has already been defined in 
> RFC3344, but is defined there as only being included in ICMP router 
> advertisements, and has been given a value of 19.  This document 
> extends it's use in that it MAY appear in a Registration Revocation 
> message.  In doing this, it already appears in the 'non-skippable' 
> range as defined by RFC3344, which is the correct context for its use 
> in Registration Revocation.


>      New Error Codes:

>      There are no new Mobile-IP error codes introduced by this document.

> <fin>