[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Editorial comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp-05.txt



Hi -

> From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> Cc: <iesg@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 6:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Editorial comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp-05.txt
...
> >That's not what RFC 2223 and
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-04.txt
> >have lead us to believe.  Furthermore, http://www.ietf.org/ID-nits.html
> >says they must have the IPR and copyright notices.
> >
> The IPR notice stuff is a very recent change.  I believe that 2223 is
> just stating what will be in RFCs, not what the I-D author has to do.
...

Just for clarification:
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt explicitly references 2223,
so it seemed logical to me to understand it as applying to I-D authors.

Randy