[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Evaluation: draft-ietf-cdi-scenarios - Content Internetworking (CDI) Scenarios to Informational
- To: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
- Subject: Evaluation: draft-ietf-cdi-scenarios - Content Internetworking (CDI) Scenarios to Informational
- From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:09:08 -0400
Last Call to expire on: 2003-4-16
Please return the full line with your position.
Yes No-Objection Discuss * Abstain
Harald Alvestrand [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Steve Bellovin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Randy Bush [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Bill Fenner [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Ned Freed [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Ted Hardie [ X ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Russ Housley [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Allison Mankin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Thomas Narten [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Erik Nordmark [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Jon Peterson [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Bert Wijnen [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Alex Zinin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass.
* Indicate reason if 'Discuss'.
^L
To: IETF-Announce:;
Dcc: *******
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>,
Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, cdn@ops.ietf.org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Document Action: Content Internetworking (CDI) Scenarios to
Informational
-------------
The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Content Internetworking (CDI)
Scenarios' <draft-ietf-cdi-scenarios-01.txt> as an Informational RFC.
This document is the product of the Content Distribution
Internetworking Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Ned Freed
and Ted Hardie.
Technical Summary
This document presents scenarios for content internetworking,
in order to provide concrete examples of what may happen
when two content networks interconnect. This work was originally
intended to be part of the evaluation process for a standards-track
protocol for content internetworking. While the IETF does not
foresee pursuing continued work on content internetworking
at this time, this document provides both useful scenarios for
understanding the rational behind the original work and a record of
the working group's thinking.
Working Group Summary
There was consensus in the working group for this as
an Informational document.
Protocol Quality
This document was reviewed for the IESG by Ted Hardie.