[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-cdi-scenarios

A while back (before the ID-tracker) we asked for the ability to attach ballots to informationals, so that we could keep track of ADs' "important" comments.

This sometimes works still, and I think it should - if an AD has objected strenously to a document, we should not forget that even if the AD misses the call where the doc is on the agenda.

But it doesn't happen all the time.

Harald


--On torsdag, april 24, 2003 16:55:48 -0700 Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com> wrote:

Howdy,
	I note that https://www.ietf.org/IESG/internal/agenda.html has
a ballot for draft-ietf-cdi-scenarios, but it is the only one of the
Working group submission class to have a ballot.  This is going
for Informational.
	I did ask for an IETF Last Call for the document, really just
to see if anyone would read it and respond.  Did that trigger a
ballot for it?  Do we really need one?
				regards,
						Ted Hardie