Re: ID-NITS on: draft-smith-urn-mpeg-01.txt

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <200304272210.h3RMAfQ01848@boreas.isi.edu>, Bob Braden writes:
>
>  *> 
>  *> One reason is that some non-IESGers have been objecting to I-Ds that 
>  *> don't meet the nits.  If they're important, we should enforce them; if 
>  *> they aren't, let's pull them from the list, and save everyone work.
>  *> 
>Steve,
>
>Or simply regard them as guidelines, for which authors are expected
>to give best-effort service (which is what I thought they were,
>at least until recently.)
>

Works for me, as long as we understand the ones that are really 
important.  (I just bounced an I-D back to the authors for a new 
abstract, since there couldn't have been a meaningful Last Call with 
the one they sent me.)

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)