Re: [iesg-secretary #6785] [ietf-provreg] provreg wg responses to IESG comments

["Jacqueline Hargest" <jhargest@foretec.com>]

Your request #6785 was resolved by jhargest:

IESG: FYI

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
>To: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
>Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] provreg wg responses to IESG comments

wow, its amazing that this process works sometimes, ant to all those that
have worked on the documents, and especially scott, a hearty thank you.

i do still have one issue with the language "for marketing purposes"

I know of no AUP under any TLD that allows a contact to be used for ANY
marketing purpose, and as suck I request this language be changed to

<contact/>: Contact information not restricted by contact, though other
AUP may apply.

also specificly strike "for the promotion of a product or service."

no registry has ever allowed this and most specificly prevent such, this
doesn't be long in an RFC.

I know all the above was unintentional and i'm sure once you think about
it you'll agree too.


best,

-rick



On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Edward Lewis wrote:

>
> 2. Within the optional dcp (data collection policy) element: there is a
> non-technical spin in at least the following label definition, what kind of
> marketing is meant?
>
>    <contact/>: Contact for marketing purposes.
>
> Please add more to this definition so that is more neutral in in its
> terminology.
>
> RESOLUTION: The description of this element has been changed as follows:
>
> "<contact/>: Contact for marketing purposes.  Information can be used to
> contact individuals, through a communications channel other than the
> protocol, for the promotion of a product or service.".
>