RE: HEELLLLOOOOOO: - Re: FW: Application for port-number (more tech)

["Michelle S. Cotton" <cotton@icann.org>]

Harald and I were supposed to talk about
this in San Francisco but never got the chance.
It is probably going to be a series of large documents.
The IANA registries sure have not been getting any smaller :)
Thought needs to go into how to do this and whether or not
we include every single registry.  Some are quite large (Port
numbers and Private Enterprise numbers).

Michelle


-----Original Message-----
From: iesg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Joyce
Reynolds
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 9:26 AM
To: fenner@research.att.com; fred@cisco.com
Cc: iana@iana.org; iesg@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: HEELLLLOOOOOO: - Re: FW: Application for port-number (more
tech)




1700 Assigned Numbers. J. Reynolds, J. Postel. October 1994. (Format:
     TXT=458860 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC1340) (Obsoleted by RFC3232) (Also
     STD0002) (Status: HISTORIC)


3232 Assigned Numbers: RFC 1700 is Replaced by an On-line Database. J.
     Reynolds, Ed.. January 2002. (Format: TXT=3849 bytes) (Obsoletes
     RFC1700) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)



IANA still needs to "replace" the above placeholder with an updated document, 
but there is no way in hell that a port-numbers registry IS the replacement for 
the original "Assigned Numbers" RFC.

Formally one of the IANA staff (March 1983 - March 2001).