Last Call to expire on: 2003-3-21
Please return the full line with your position.
Yes No-Objection Discuss * Abstain
Harald Alvestrand [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Steve Bellovin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Randy Bush [ X ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Bill Fenner [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Ned Freed [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Ted Hardie [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Russ Housley [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Allison Mankin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Thomas Narten [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Erik Nordmark [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Jon Peterson [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Bert Wijnen [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Alex Zinin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass.
* Indicate reason if 'Discuss'.
^L
To: IETF-Announce:;
Dcc: *******
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>,
Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>,
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed
Standard
-------------
The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'IANA Considerations for
RADIUS' <draft-aboba-radius-iana-07.txt> as a Proposed Standard.
This has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Randy Bush and Bert Wijnen.
Technical Summary
This document provides guidance to the Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority, IANA, regarding registration of values related to the
Remote Authentication Dial In User Service, RADIUS, defined in
RFC2865.
There are three name spaces in RADIUS that require registration:
Packet Type Codes, Attribute Types, and Attribute Values (for
certain Attributes).
The document also reserves Packet Type Codes that are or have been
in use on the Internet. The document creates no new IANA
registries, as the RADIUS registry was created by RFC2865.
Note that RADIUS is not intended as a general-purpose protocol,
and this document makes clear that allocations should not be made
for purposes unrelated to Authentication, Authorization or
Accounting.
Working Group Summary
As this document is not the product of an IETF working group,
there was a four week IETF last call. There was some discussion
and there were a few differing views, one in particular. The
document was subsequently revised to take the comments into
account as much as possible.
Protocol Quality
This document was reviewed for the IESG by Randy Bush and many
others.