Re: [iesg-secretary #6885] Evaluation: draft-aboba-radius-iana - IANA Considerations

["Jacqueline Hargest" <jhargest@foretec.com>]

Your request #6885 was resolved by jhargest:

Please disregard the evaluation, which was mistakenly sent out 
last week.  The document was already approved and the 
announcement will be sent.  Sorry for any confusion.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>,
>From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
>Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-aboba-radius-iana - IANA Considerations

How can Data Tracker show this document in 
"<idtracker.htm>Approved-announcement to be sent" when we just got the 
ballot yesterday?

Russ

At 02:54 PM 5/2/2003 -0400, IESG Secretary wrote:

>Last Call to expire on: 2003-3-21
>
>         Please return the full line with your position.
>
>                     Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain
>
>
>Harald Alvestrand   [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Steve Bellovin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Randy Bush          [ X ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Bill Fenner         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Ned Freed           [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Ted Hardie          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Russ Housley        [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Allison Mankin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Thomas Narten       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Erik Nordmark       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Jon Peterson        [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Bert Wijnen         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>Alex Zinin          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
>
>
>  2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass.
>
>  * Indicate reason if 'Discuss'.
>
>^L
>To: IETF-Announce:;
>Dcc: *******
>Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>,
>  Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>,
>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
>Subject: Protocol Action: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed
>         Standard
>-------------
>
>
>The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'IANA Considerations for
>  RADIUS' <draft-aboba-radius-iana-07.txt> as a Proposed Standard.
>  This has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
>  IETF Working Group.
>
>  The IESG contact persons are Randy Bush and Bert Wijnen.
>
>  Technical Summary
>
>    This document provides guidance to the Internet Assigned Numbers
>    Authority, IANA, regarding registration of values related to the
>    Remote Authentication Dial In User Service, RADIUS, defined in
>    RFC2865.
>
>    There are three name spaces in RADIUS that require registration:
>    Packet Type Codes, Attribute Types, and Attribute Values (for
>    certain Attributes).
>
>    The document also reserves Packet Type Codes that are or have been
>    in use on the Internet. The document creates no new IANA
>    registries, as the RADIUS registry was created by RFC2865.
>
>    Note that RADIUS is not intended as a general-purpose protocol,
>    and this document makes clear that allocations should not be made
>    for purposes unrelated to Authentication, Authorization or
>    Accounting.
>
>  Working Group Summary
>
>    As this document is not the product of an IETF working group,
>    there was a four week IETF last call. There was some discussion
>    and there were a few differing views, one in particular. The
>    document was subsequently revised to take the comments into
>    account as much as possible.
>
>  Protocol Quality
>
>    This document was reviewed for the IESG by Randy Bush and many
>    others.