Re: remove draft-aboba-radius-rfc2869bis-21.txt from today's agenda

[Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>]

Thanks. We'll also handle any IESG comments we've received in -22.

On Thu, 15 May 2003, Randy Bush wrote:

> From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> Subject: Re: For mid-June agenda?
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > they are on the agenda
>
> We've just had an additional issue come up with respect to
> RFC 2869bis-21.  Glen Zorn has found some issues with the suggested RADIUS
> retransmission behavior.  We could put off the IESG review for a few weeks
> in order to resolve his comments -- or the IESG can review his comments
> along with RFC 2869bis-21.  The issue isn't terribly complex -- Glen
> is suggesting that jitter be added and that the RTOinitial should be
> larger than 3 seconds;  in addition he is asking that we separate
> out the material on RADIUS retransmission behavior into a separate
> document that would apply to all of RADIUS, not just RADIUS/EAP.
>
> Overall, I agree with Glen's comments.  If we put off the IESG review a
> few weeks, we can address them in a -22.
>