Glen CC:'d his comments to iesg@ietf.org so you should have seen them. The fix is to remove the offending paragraph and reference to RFC 2988. On Thu, 15 May 2003, Russ Housley wrote: > We should pass on the comments that were already posted, this should reduce > the number of round trips. > > Russ > > > At 09:57 AM 5/15/2003 +0200, Randy Bush wrote: > >From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com> > >To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> > >Subject: Re: For mid-June agenda? > >Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:24:16 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > they are on the agenda > > > >We've just had an additional issue come up with respect to > >RFC 2869bis-21. Glen Zorn has found some issues with the suggested RADIUS > >retransmission behavior. We could put off the IESG review for a few weeks > >in order to resolve his comments -- or the IESG can review his comments > >along with RFC 2869bis-21. The issue isn't terribly complex -- Glen > >is suggesting that jitter be added and that the RTOinitial should be > >larger than 3 seconds; in addition he is asking that we separate > >out the material on RADIUS retransmission behavior into a separate > >document that would apply to all of RADIUS, not just RADIUS/EAP. > > > >Overall, I agree with Glen's comments. If we put off the IESG review a > >few weeks, we can address them in a -22. >