Re:http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mrose-ietf-posting-03.txt

[Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>]

> Looks good in general. One nit/comment/whatever:
    
thanks!
    
> Section 5 - security considerations:
> 
> You may wish to add a sentence or three re-mentioning what provisions
> there are to prevent a DoS against a person's ability to post (most
> notably, the "communitu discussion" phase, and the appeals process).

this can be done, but to do so requires a broadening of the meaning of
"security" beyond the traditional ietf context... hence the wording in the
existing section.
    
/mtr