[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt



OTOH, I can see the value with the middle one, but I am just afraid
that this then will get stuck in endless loops...
if you fear endless loops, avoid three.  two was a compromise.

i can live with one.  as you say, it's been around and discussed
since dirt was invented.

Also, this is no longer a requirements document per se, so I am not sure the input from v6ops or ipv6 would help much.

But I leave this to you to decide. I have no problems with two either. Some PR for multi6 might be good ;-)

- kurtis -