The multi6 WG have through a last-call verified consensus on the
document draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt and want to
request this to be published as an informational RFC.
i have placed on the iesg agenda for 2003.06.12. but i wonder if
this deserves wider review, e.g., v6ops. what do you think? some
alternatives:
o let it go to iesg with no further review. after all, anyone
really interested is in the multi6 fray and should have read
it.
o send a note over to v6ops and maybe ipv6 and/or grow wgs to say
they might want to read and comment before 2003.06.12.
o issue a two week ietf-wide last call. yes, this can and has
been done for info docs.
i am inclined to the middle one, but do not feel strongly. opinion
and advice solicited.
As this is only a "goals" document that has been around for quite a
long time, I am somewhat inclined to vote for one or three with a
preference to one...