[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt



But I leave this to you to decide. I have no problems with two either. Some PR for multi6 might be good ;-)
I also like the compromise number two; it doesn't hurt when
coupled with a time-limit, and should avoid screams of lack of
consultation from most people.

Ok. that was also Haralds vote, so let's go for that then.

Randy, will you send this to the other WGs?

- kurtis -