the document draft-aboba-radius-rfc2869bis-22.txt is informational
as opposed to standards track because
o a standards track document may not make normative reference
to a document at a 'lesser' status
o draft-aboba-radius-rfc2869bis-22.txt has normative references
to rfcs 1321 and 2104, both of which are informational
o it also makes inescapable normative reference to
draft-chiba-radius-dynamic-authorization-20.txt, which will
be informational.
randy