Re: draft-pillay-esnault-ospf-flooding-05.txt

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Bill Fenner wrote:
> >It would seem to me that a subset of RFC1793 (rather than all of it) would
> >also be enough.
> 
> DoNotAge LSAs, which are the only part of 1793 that this document
> requires, are already a subset - do you mean a subset of DNA?

No, I meant 1793.  It is not clear enough, IMO, which parts of 1793 are
required to implment draft-pillay-esnault-ospf-flooding-05.txt.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings