[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 57th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - Draft Agenda (as of June 19th)
- To: Dinara Suleymanova <dinaras@ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: 57th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - Draft Agenda (as of June 19th)
- From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:30:46 -0700
- Cc: iesg <iesg@ietf.org>
btw, while i know you can't do magic, this is a real problem
and i still do not understand where and how we went from eight
to seven parallel sessions. can someone please explain.
randy
---
From: Supratik Bhattacharyya <Supratik@sprintlabs.com>
To: 'Nevil Brownlee' <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>,
'Dinara Suleymanova' <dinaras@ietf.org>
Cc: 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>, agenda@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org,
wgchairs@ietf.org, bofchairs@ietf.org
Subject: RE: 57th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - Draft Agenda (as of June 19th)
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:48:30 -0700
Yes, the BOF will suffer badly if the ipfix-ers cannot attend - in fact,
ipfix was on the conflict list when we had submitted a slot request for
ispmon. Can something be done about this?
Thanks,
Supratik