[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 57th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - Draft Agenda (as of June 19th)
In message <E19UVlE-000MLu-1O@ran.psg.com>, Randy Bush writes:
>> Switching with OPSEC on?
>>
>> Thursday
>> 1300-1500 Afternoon Sessions I
>> Hall LM APP trade Internet Open Trading Protocol WG
>> Hall NO INT atommib AToM MIB WG
>> Hall F2 INT eap Extensible Authentication Protocol WG *
>> Hall GH OPS opsec Operational Security Requirements BOF
>> Hall IK SUB ppvpn Provider Provisioned Virtual Private Networks WG *
>> Hall E2 TSV pmtud Path Maximum Transmission Unit Discovery PWG
>> Hall F1 TSV sipping Session Initiation Proposal Investigation
>
>opsec has not conflicts with ispmon. but, if i read it aright,
>
>1500-1530 Break (Refreshments provided) -
>1530-1730 Afternoon Sessions II
>APP lemonade License to Enhance Messaging Oriented Network Access for
> Diverse Endpoints WG
>INT ddbof Device Discovery BOF
>OPS ipfix IP Flow Information Export WG
>OPS ispmon Monitoring Infrastructure Deployment BOF
>SEC saag Open Security Area Directorate
>TSV rddp Remote Direct Data Placement WG
>TSV seamoby Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and
> Dormant Mode Host Alerting WG
>
>that would put opsec next to saag, which may or may not cause whining
>from the security community
>
It would indeed be bad.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)