RE: 57th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - Draft Agenda (as of June 19th)

[Supratik Bhattacharyya <Supratik@sprintlabs.com>]

Yes, the BOF will suffer badly if the ipfix-ers cannot attend - in fact,
ipfix was on the conflict list when we had submitted a slot request for
ispmon. Can something be done about this?

Thanks,

Supratik

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wgchairs@ietf.org [mailto:owner-wgchairs@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Nevil Brownlee
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Dinara Suleymanova
Cc: Randy Bush; agenda@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org; wgchairs@ietf.org;
bofchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 57th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - Draft Agenda (as of June
19th)


7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


Hi Dinara:

The 20 June version of the draft agenda shows

OPS     ipfix    IP Flow Information Export WG
OPS     ispmon   Monitoring Infrastructure Deployment BOF

Scheduled together on Thursday afternoon - this is a direct clash, since
many of the people interested are already involved with IPFIX. Can we
find a different time for one or other of these, please?

Cheers, Nevil

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Nevil Brownlee                   Director, Technology Development
   Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941     ITSS, The University of Auckland
   FAX: +64 9 373 7021      Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through University of Auckland http://www.auckland.ac.nz/