Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard

[IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>]

Last Call to expire on: 2003-6-23

	Please return the full line with your position.

                    Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain


Harald Alvestrand   [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Steve Bellovin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Randy Bush          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Bill Fenner         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Ned Freed           [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Ted Hardie          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Russ Housley        [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Allison Mankin      [ X ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Thomas Narten       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Erik Nordmark       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Jon Peterson        [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Bert Wijnen         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Alex Zinin          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]


 2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass.

 * Indicate reason if 'Discuss'.

^L
---- following is a DRAFT of message to be sent AFTER approval ---
To: IETF-Announce:;
Dcc: *******
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>,
 Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, enum@ietf.org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to 
         Proposed Standard
-------------


The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'The E.164 to URI DDDS Application
(ENUM)' <draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis-06.txt> as a Proposed Standard.
This document is the product of the Telephone Number Mapping Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Allison Mankin and Jon Peterson.
 
Technical Summary

This document specifies how DNS can be used for identifying available
services connected to one E.164 number. It specifically obsoletes RFC
2916 to bring it in line with the Dynamic Delegation Discovery System
(DDDS) Application specification found in RFC 3401 and its companion
RFCs.
 
Working Group Summary
 
  The working group strongly supported advancement of the draft, after
  careful technical review.
 
Protocol Quality
 
  There are currently in prototype use several implementations of this
  draft, and registries of services following the format here are under
  active development. The document was reviewed for the IESG by Allison
  Mankin

RFC Editor Note -

Change the first sentence of Section 3.1.4 Publication Requirements:

Old:
      Proposals for Enumservices registered must be published as RFCs on
      the Standards Track or as a BCP.
New:
      Proposals for Enumservices registered must be published as RFCs.