[IETF57] coach BOF

[Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>]

bernard aboba's "let's make wg process better" was a good presentation.
margaret's "make wg process visible" "silence != consensus" - i agree.
brian's "review team"

question (maybe i'm dumb): what is the exact difference w/ what problem wg
is targetted to do?


---
exisitng rfc editorial guidelines - scott bradner
quality: overview and framework
	a comprehensive approach to quality
	ietf problem resolution processes
starting new work
	the bof process: the critique
	iesg overload and quality of wgs

mindset
	the truth is out there, somewhere
reading list
	people who have read at least three of the documents, please sit ni the first two rows

a format
	strict time limit for each topic and presentation
	q&a at the end
	use mic

---
exisitng rfc editorial guidelines - scott bradner

how to write a high-quality standard track document
increase interoperability of independent implementations

---
wg quality plan
	public document no more than 5 pages long
	developed in concert with the wg charter
	signed off by the ad and the wg founders 
	reviewed by AD

wg charter - the foundation
challenge assessment - what's in the way (reality check)
tools plan
	mailign list, web site, issue tracking tools, revision control system,
	document production and build environment
review plan
	checkponits
	required reviewer skill set
	review process
	reviewer recruitment

many WGs doing this informally
let's make it more widespread