Re: Doc in odd state

[hardie@qualcomm.com]

Ah, so "point raised writeup needed" is getting reused for
"rfc editor note required".  Makes sense; thanks for the
clue.
			Ted


At 1:53 PM -0400 7/31/03, Thomas Narten wrote:
>  >	draft-legg-ldapext-component-matching is in my queue as
> >  "approved-announcement-to-be-sent::point-raised writeup needed".
> >  I thought we cleared up all the issues on the IESG telechat just
> >  prior to Vienna.  Do neurons fire for anyone on what this
> >  state means?  I thought "point-raised writeup needed" was for
> >  discusses that had not yet been sent in.
> > 	Any clue gratefully received,
> That's not what the July 10 draft minutes say:
>
> >  o draft-legg-ldapext-component-matching-11.txt - 1 of 1
> >  LDAP & X.500 Component Matching Rules (Proposed Standard)
> >  Token: Hardie, Ted
> >
> >  The document was approved by the IESG pending an RFC Editor Note to be
> >  prepared by Ted Hardie.  The Secretariat will send an individual
> >  submission Protocol Action Announcement that includes the RFC Editor Note.
> Thomas