Re: Internal WG Review: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4)

[Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>]

This would be covered in Reverse tunnelling for MIP (RFC 3024), in the
case without NAT. If you are looking at a visited network behind a NAT,
you also need NAT traversal for MIP (RFC 3519). Using these, all traffic
to and from the mobile node will be using topologically correct
addresses. ( All supposing, of course that your question doesn't have
hidden depths that currently escape me :-)

	Henrik

Thursday 31 July 2003, Harald wrote:
> query, probably showing my ignorance of the MIPv4 state:
> 
> is there anything in this charter that addresses the problem of running 
> MobileIPv4 with networks using ingress filtering, or is this a problem that 
> is solved by already published specifications?
> 
>                    harald