RE: Evaluation: draft-ietf-impp-im - Common Profile for Instant Messaging (CPIM)

["Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>]

Yes, it's okay to turn it into a single. We discussed this a bit on the IMPP
list (at least for presence); including multiple targets in the destination
URI in this fashion was another thing that was considered unnecessary for
minimal interoperability.

- J

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Fenner [mailto:fenner@research.att.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:48 PM
> To: jon.peterson@neustar.biz
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Evaluation: draft-ietf-impp-im - Common Profile 
> for Instant
> Messaging (CPIM)
> 
> 
> 
> Jon,
> 
> >> draft-ietf-impp-im-03.txt uses RFC 822 ABNF (#mailbox).
> >
> >Doh, someone caught this at the last minute in impp-pres-03, 
> but I gather it
> >wasn't fixed in impp-im-03. I'm happy to chop off the #.
> 
> Turning it from a list to a single element only is ok?  (Otherwise
> the replacement would be something like: mailbox *("," mailbox) )
> 
>   Bill
>