[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Last Call **Revised**: 'Using AES CCM Mode With IPsec ESP' to Proposed Standard
- To: <iesg@ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: Last Call **Revised**: 'Using AES CCM Mode With IPsec ESP' to Proposed Standard
- From: "IANA" <iana@iana.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:13:43 -0700
- Cc: <housley@vigilsec.com>
- In-reply-to: <E19nMvq-0001IP-Fd@asgard.ietf.org>
IESG:
The IANA has reviewed the following Internet-Draft which is
in Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-ccm-04.txt>, and
has the following comments with regards to the publication of
this document:
In section 7.3 it says the following:
7.3. Phase 2 Identifier
For IKE Phase 2 negotiations, IANA has assigned three ESP Transform
Identifiers for AES-CCM with an explicit IV:
<TBD1> for AES-CCM with an 8 octet ICV;
<TBD2> for AES-CCM with a 12 octet ICV; and
<TBD3> for AES-CCM with a 16 octet ICV.
Yet in the IANA considerations section it says:
11. IANA Considerations
IANA has assigned nine ESP transform numbers for use with AES-CCM
with an explicit IV:
<TBD1> for AES-CCM with an 8 octet ICV;
<TBD2> for AES-CCM with a 12 octet ICV; and
<TBD3> for AES-CCM with a 16 octet ICV.
Should it say "three" instead of "nine"?
We understand these registrations will go in the
following registry, under the heading
"IPSEC ESP Transform Identifiers":
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/isakmp-registry>
Please respond to the IANA about our concerns with regards to this
document. Failing to do so may cause delay of the approval and
publication of your document.
Thank you.
Michelle S. Cotton
(on behalf of the IANA)