Dealing with your IESG appeal (fwd)

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

Tony,
I haven't seen a reply from you to this message that I sent Monday of last 
week.
Since the IESG has your appeal on its plate tomorrow, it would be greatly 
helpful if you could reply before that.

                           Harald

---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Date: 25. august 2003 09:53 -0700
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Dealing with your IESG appeal

Tony,

we've put the text of your appeal up on the IESG web pages at
<http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/tony-hain-appeal.txt>

Is this the right text to your appeal, or is there anything else you'd like
to add to it?

My understanding of what you write is:

- You're appealing the decision of the WG chairs to declare consensus taken
during the San Francisco WG meeting

- The basis of the appeal is that the question asked was unclear

- You wish for the declaration of consensus to be overturned

On the last point, to be more exact: Are you asking for:

- a declaration that there was no consensus on deprecating site-local in
the WG meeting? - a declaration that we do not know whether there was a
consensus or not on deprecating site-local in the WG meeting? - a
declaration that there are reasonable interpretations of the words
"deprecate site-local" for which the meeting did not have consensus? - a
declaration that there are reasonable interpretations of the words
"deprecate site-local" for which we do not know whether or not the meeting
had consensus?

Your text refers to the mailing list discussion only by saying "The
question asked to the list was no clearer." Do you wish us to treat the
determination of consensus on the list as a separate issue, or do you wish
us to consider the behaviour of the chairs in the meeting only?

                  Harald


---------- End Forwarded Message ----------