RE: Evaluation: draft-ietf-secsh-architecture-14

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

                        Yes      NoObj      Discuss    Abstain
    Bert Wijnen        [   ]     [ X  ]       [   ]      [   ]
 

Comments/Nits:
 
draft-ietf-secsh-architecture-14

- has references to obsoleted RFCs (RFC1700, RFC1766)
  or soon to be obsoleted (RFC 2279)
- references not split in normative/informative
 
draft-ietf-secsh-connect-17

- Does not explain that MUST and such terminology is based on 
  RFC2119 and does not reference 2119
- Uses example IP addresses that are not in the range of
  addresses we have set apart for such examples.
  Pages 9, 15
- references soon to be obsoleted (RFC 2279)
- References HISTORIC RFC1884
- References obsoleted RFC1766
- References not split in normative/informative

draft-ietf-secsh-transport-16
- Referencing issues (similar to above)

draft-ietf-secsh-userauth-17
- Referencing issues (similar to above)

draft-ietf-secsh-assignednumbers-04.txt  
- citations in abstract
- no IPR statement
- Referencing issues (similar to above)
- Does not explain that MUST and such terminology is based on 
  RFC2119 and does not reference 2119

Most of these docs also have lines longer than 72

Bert