Re: Policy Statement on RFC authors

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> 3. The last section of the document (before the ISOC copyright
>    statement) has traditionally been a section listing contact
>    information for authors.  The intent of this section is to tell
>    readers how to get in touch with those people responsible for the
>    document, to seek clarification, make comments, etc.  This section
>    must include contact information for all authors; it may contain
>    contact information for some or all contributors.  In unusual cases
>    it might even include useful contacts who are highly relevant but
>    are neither authors nor contributors.
> 
>    This section has been titled "Author(s)' Addresses", but this title
>    is misleading.  It really should be "Contact Information".  It is
>    the RFC Editor's intent to change the title of this section in the
>    future to "Contact Information", after the community has had time to
>    digest and accept the change.

possibly, similarly to the way we now differentiate between
normative and devia^h^h^h^h^hnon-normative references, you
might want to differentiate contact information for authors,
contributors, and other guilty parties.

randy