[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard

To: curtis@fictitious.org
Subject: Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
From: Mark Prior <mrp@mrp.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:20:41 +0930
Cc: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, iesg@ietf.org, rpslng@ripe.net, rps@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200309230212.h8N2Bx6Z022900@mail.avici.com>
References: <200309230212.h8N2Bx6Z022900@mail.avici.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1

Curtis Villamizar wrote:

Having written plenty of small compilers I can understand why
implementors would prefer to keep things simple for them.

One group writes one compiler once, many clients use that compiler, many times. I know which group I would prefer to make life easier for :-)

Mark.

References:
- Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@laptoy770.fictitious.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread