[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
RE: References to work in progress
To
: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <
bwijnen@lucent.com
>, "'Randy Bush'" <
randy@psg.com
>, Thomas Narten <
narten@us.ibm.com
>
Subject
: RE: References to work in progress
From
: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <
harald@alvestrand.no
>
Date
: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:22:41 -0700
Cc
: iesg <
iesg@ietf.org
>, RFC Editor <
rfc-ed@isi.edu
>
In-reply-to
: <
7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155028EC304@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com
>
References
: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155028EC304@nl0006exch001u.nl.luce nt.com>
--On 26. september 2003 15:22 +0200 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> wrote:
so with Randy's comment, then the reference with just the title does not solve his problem either.
title + date is usually an unique reference.
this is an argument for the "stable snapshot series". There are lots of counterarguments to it - see solutions list.
Follow-Ups
:
RE: References to work in progress
From:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References
:
RE: References to work in progress
From:
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Prev by Date:
Internal WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext)
Next by Date:
Re: References to work in progress
Previous by thread:
RE: References to work in progress
Next by thread:
RE: References to work in progress
Index(es):
Date
Thread