Re: laugh test

[Michael StJohns <mstjohns@mindspring.com>]

Sorry - to be clear.  With apologies to Margaret, this is PC BS and not 
worth our time to discuss.  Can we get back to something useful please. *sigh*


At 09:29 9/29/2003, Michael StJohns wrote:

> Oh *phhhhhtttttt*......
>
>
>
> At 08:29 9/29/2003, Thomas Narten wrote:
> > Note, while discussing the laugh test with Margaret, she rightly
> > pointed out that the name "laugh test" is rather condescending, in
> > much the same way as terminology like "adult supervision" and so forth
> > are not viewed kindly be the IETF as a whole and contributes to the
> > "us vs. them" perception.  We probably should come up with a better
> > name.
> >
> > Thomas