[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FW: Who SHOULD be Members of the WG mailing list !!??
- To: "Iesg (E-mail)" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Subject: FW: Who SHOULD be Members of the WG mailing list !!??
- From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:17:50 +0200
FYI... quite a few of the cc:list are editorrs/authors
of MPLS MIB documents. They are listed on the front
page of such docs. But (accoring to a claim from Tom Nadeau)
they are no (longer) subscribed to the WG mailig list.
Gives you a feel for how well they "play in the IETF"
Sorry... but those sort of things do upset me.
Thanks,
Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
Sent: woensdag 1 oktober 2003 15:51
To: 'tnadeau@cisco.com'; 'Mpls (E-mail)'
Cc: arunv@force10networks.com; hans@ipunplugged.com;
jcucchiara@mindspring.com; cheenu@alumni.princeton.edu; 'Joan Cucchiara
x302'; 'Kireeti Kompella'; swallow@cisco.com; loa@pi.se;
mrm@riverstone.net; zinin@psg.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Who SHOULD be Members of the WG mailing list !!??
Tom answers me:
> >
> >
> >[Do we need to keep the long cc: list if we post to MPLS WG list ??]
>
> Yes, some folks don't read MPLS@UU.NET any longer.
>
Mmm... in my view I then have trouble considering them document
authors/editors for a WG document. Is that just me, or do I have
a weird view of how IETF WGs should work ???!!!
Bert