Re: Proposal from mstjohns: Pre-approval of RFC 2727bis

[Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>]

I am not any of IESG or ISOC BoT Chair or ISOC President,
but:  I personally think it is a reasonable proposal. Yes.

I would include posting it to the ISOC and/or IETF website
for longevity greater than 6 months, as "process followed
for this year".

Leslie.

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> Mike St. Johns has suggested that the IESG should approve the 2727bis 
> document as-is, mostly, I think, in order to fix the nomcom selection 
> that will occur on October 10.
>
> I think there's good reason for that, but also want to get the current 
> issues with the document fixed before publication.
>
> I have an alternate suggestion - that the ISOC President instruct the 
> nomcom chair to follow the instructions of 2727bis, accepting that some 
> points will be clarified as part of the ongoing process.
>
> If the IESG agrees on that, and the ISOC BoT and ISOC President does not 
> object, we can do it. But we have to decide by tomorrow.
>
> What do people think?
>
> NOTE: If I hear one person among the IESG + ISOC BoT Chair + ISOC 
> President saying "NO, can't do", I dont' think we can do it. I'd also 
> like to have people say "YES".
>
> Comments?
>
>                 Harald


--

-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
    Yours to discover."
                               -- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------