[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue

To: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
Subject: Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:43:55 -0400
Cc: moore@cs.utk.edu, narten@us.ibm.com, michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us, harald@alvestrand.no, alh-ietf@tndh.net, iab@iab.org, iesg@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <IKEDILMOGFKPCDJAMFKKEEDOCMAA.alh-ietf@tndh.net>
References: <200310101559.h9AFxcQR005188@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com> <IKEDILMOGFKPCDJAMFKKEEDOCMAA.alh-ietf@tndh.net>

> You are listening to a very limited subset of the 'community'. I have had
> several questions from fortune 500 network managers as to 'what now?' They
> plan to roll out IPv6 with addresses that are in either the FEC0 range
> anyway, or are trusting that the proposed replacement FC00 will be finalized
> soon.

maybe those people are being fed bad information.  the question is, by whom?

References:
- Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
- RE: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue
  - From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Removing features
Next by Date: RE: Proposal from mstjohns: Pre-approval of RFC 2727bis
Previous by thread: Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue
Next by thread: Re: Appeal to the IAB on the site-local issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread