[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-reqts-05.txt

Randy:

should this not be stds track, maybe bcp, as it uses 2119 language,
and i think we would like to give it weight?

It is an Informational document.

and i don't think NOT should be used in

    For example, requiring that a protocol support confidentiality
    is NOT the same thing as requiring that all protocol traffic be
    encrypted.

Agree.

and

    A protocol submission is not compliant if it fails to satisfy
    one or more of the MUST or MUST NOT requirements for the
    capabilities that it implements.  A protocol submission that
    satisfies all the MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD and SHOULD NOT
    requirements for its capabilities is said to be
    "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the MUST
    and MUST NOT requirements but not all the SHOULD or SHOULD NOT
    requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally
    compliant."

use of 2119 is abstracted an amusing level.  but i don't think it
can be improved.

No change is requested.

Russ