[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DRM at the network layer?

To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
Subject: Re: DRM at the network layer?
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: 27 Oct 2003 19:18:47 -0800
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, iab@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20031028025835.D47C67B43@berkshire.research.att.com>
References: <20031028025835.D47C67B43@berkshire.research.att.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> writes:
> I received another pointer to dtcp.com -- it has such lovely things as 
> maximum permissible RTTs and assorted other attempts to ensure that 
> content stays "local".

It's incredibly stupid. I'd be amazed if the mean time between
deployment and circumvention technology being available
exceeded a month.

-Ekr

-- 
[Eric Rescorla                                   ekr@rtfm.com]
                http://www.rtfm.com/

References:
- Re: DRM at the network layer?
  - From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>

Prev by Date: Re: DRM at the network layer?
Next by Date: Evaluation: draft-ietf-webdav-acl-12
Previous by thread: Re: DRM at the network layer?
Next by thread: Re: [iesg-secretary #15115] Fwd: Request for early RFC number: draft-ietf-avt-mpeg4-simple-08.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread