[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comments regarding draft-freed-mime-p4-04.txt
I have been asked to comment on draft-freed-mime-p4-04 as the person in
the W3C's XML Protocols Working Group (XMLP) primarily responsible for
shepherding the registration of the "application/soap+xml" media type.
First of all, let me say that I believe that the general approach taken
in draft-freed-mime-p4-04 will greatly assist other, non-IETF standards
organisations in the registration of their media types.
However, I do have some concerns with the present draft's lack of
clarity regarding the timing of such registrations.
In particular, at what point should a standards organisation contact
the IESG regarding registration? Section 3.1.1 states that
"Registrations in the standards tree MUST be approved by the IESG and
MUST correspond to a formal publication by a recognized standards
body." Does "formal" imply "final" here, or should earlier drafts be
submitted for feedback? Also, some indication of how one determines
what are "recognized standards bod[ies]" would be helpful to those
unfamiliar with the IETF.
Additionally, some indication of the expected processing time (or,
ideally, service guarantees) would help other standards organisations
in planning (especially if the media type registration is required
before a document can be considered final; this might lead to an
unfortunate catch-22 situation).
The resolution of the issues above, as applied to
draft-freed-mime-p4-04, would have greatly helped XMLP in its
registration of "application/soap+xml" (and I hope that it will assist
us in our future registration(s)).
While reviewing the draft, I also noticed that in Section 3.5,
"index.html" is not necessary, and implies (to many people) a specific
format and (to many Web servers) a particular implementation.
Considering the likely longevity of this as an RFC, I'd suggest
"http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/".
Thank you for the opportunity to comment,
--
Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO BEA Systems