Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-secsh-architecture-14

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

--On 27. oktober 2003 09:58 -0500 Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> 2.  The RFC Index says (I may not have the most recent version, but it is
> not too old):
>
>     1700 Assigned Numbers. J. Reynolds, J. Postel. October 1994. (Format:
>          TXT=458860 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC1340) (Also STD0002) (Status:
>          STANDARD)

the obsoleting RFC is this one:

3232 Assigned Numbers: RFC 1700 is Replaced by an On-line Database. J.
    Reynolds, Ed.. January 2002. (Format: TXT=3849 bytes) (Obsoletes
    RFC1700) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)

and the 10/10/2003 RFC index has the proper obsoletion, so you need to 
update.
(I haven't done anything to track changes to the RFC index.... anyone?)

                  Harald