[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: my action items from sunday's rssac meeting

To: randy@psg.com
Subject: Re: my action items from sunday's rssac meeting
From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:21:57 +0900 (JST)
Cc: sra@hactrn.net, iab@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:17:50 -0600" <E1AKJEF-0002Ek-BX@roam.psg.com>
References: <E1AKJEF-0002Ek-BX@roam.psg.com>

> > whether ipv6 anycast is useful as specified.
> 
> it has been widely known to be so broken as to be irrelevant for
> years

	it is a problem with the term "anycast", it is used ambiguously.
	therefore i had to introduce distinction, in the i-d, between rfc2373
	anycast and ipv4 anycast practiced today.

itojun

Follow-Ups:
- Re: my action items from sunday's rssac meeting
  - From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>

References:
- Re: my action items from sunday's rssac meeting
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: my action items from sunday's rssac meeting
Next by Date: Evaluation: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-nisconfig-03.txt to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: my action items from sunday's rssac meeting
Next by thread: Re: my action items from sunday's rssac meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread