[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: A Proposal for Moving Forward on draft-ietf-radext-ieee802
We are very near publishing the next version with all of the filtering
issues resolved. I would like to publish this version and see how well
that draft proceeds. If the filtering function continues to hold up
this version, then we should consider your proposal. I'll will get a
firm date on when the next version will be published.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 1:08 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: A Proposal for Moving Forward on draft-ietf-radext-ieee802
> It is now more than 6 months since draft-ietf-radext-ieee802
> went through WG last call, and progress on resolving the
> Issues from WG last call has been
> slow. This document is now a year behind schedule -- and
> counting. We
> need to find a way to make more rapid progress.
> Looking over the Last Call issues, it would appear that the
> majority of them relate to the filtering functionality, and
> relatively few comments relate to the VLAN and Priority functionality.
> In order to enable this document to be completed without
> further delays, I would like to propose that the Filtering
> functionality be removed from this document, and allowed to
> progress separately.
> This would allow for an -01 version of this documented to be
> posted within the next two weeks, followed by a two week WG
> last call, and submission to the IESG by IETF 65.
> to unsubscribe send a message to
> firstname.lastname@example.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.