RE: A Proposal for Moving Forward on draft-ietf-radext-ieee802

["Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>]

Bernard Aboba <> supposedly scribbled:

> It is now more than 6 months since draft-ietf-radext-ieee802 went
> through WG last call, and progress on resolving the Issues from WG
> last call has been  
> slow.  This document is now a year behind schedule -- and counting.  
> We 
> need to find a way to make more rapid progress.

One thing that might be helpful is if the authors would actually publish a new version once in a while...

> 
> Looking over the Last Call issues, it would appear that the majority
> of them relate to the filtering functionality, and relatively few
> comments relate to the VLAN and Priority functionality.  
> 
> In order to enable this document to be completed without further
> delays, I would like to propose that the Filtering functionality be
> removed from this document, and allowed to progress separately.  
> 
> This would allow for an -01 version of this documented to be posted
> within the next two weeks, followed by a two week WG last call, and
> submission to the IESG by IETF 65.  

Hope this helps,

~gwz

Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by simply
  listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>