RE: New Technical Issues RE: WG last call in progress on VLAN/Priority Draft

["Avi Lior" <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

I see so you PREFER that work that has complex attribute not be done in
RADEXT.

If the waiter said:  " Would you prefer the chicken or the beef"

and you said to the waiter:  " I prefer the chicken"

You would be upset if you got the beef.  Right?

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aland@nitros9.org [mailto:aland@nitros9.org] On Behalf 
> Of Alan DeKok
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 4:29 PM
> To: Avi Lior
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: New Technical Issues RE: WG last call in 
> progress on VLAN/Priority Draft
> 
> "Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org> wrote:
> > And you also said this: right?
> > > > >   If the content of an attribute is a complex structure as=20 
> > > > > determined by the application, I would *prefer* that the=20
> > > structure=20
> > > > > is defined elsewhere, and the RADIUS docs simply reference it.
> > 
> > Defined elsewhere means to me its forbiden in RADIUS.
> 
>   prefer != forbid.
> 
>   Please stop claiming I'm trying to forbid complex attributes.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>