[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt



I'm not sure what you're getting at here. User-Priority-Table does only
affect the port-based priority settings and is not enforced on a
per-user or per-session basis.

MS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:07 AM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig
> Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio (ProCurve); Bernard Aboba; 
> radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt
> 
> Hi Mauricio,
> 
> another issue that came to my mind again was raised during 
> the discussion with Bernard is that the User-Priority-Table 
> is used for remapping of user priorities only according to 
> the User Priority Regeneration table. The conclusion of our 
> discussion was that your draft does not aim to attemp to 
> associate the actual data traffic with the QoS classes.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> > Hi Mauricio,
> > 
> > thanks for responding to this issue. Please find my response below:
> > 
> >>>> your new text proposal looks much better.
> >>>>
> >>>> You need to modify Section 3 as well:
> >>>>
> >>>> "
> >>>>  Access-   Access-  Access-  Access-    CoA-
> >>>>   Request   Accept   Reject   Challenge  Req    #   Attribute
> >>>>     0        0-1      0        0         0-1   TBD  
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> User-Priority-Table
> >>>
> >>>> "
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Got it.   BTW, do you think that *any* of the attributes are 
> >>> appropriate for inclusion in an Accounting-Request?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> An argument to allow these attributes in an 
> Accounting-Request is for
> >> forensic purposes.  The accounting server is already aggregating a
> >> number of session characteristics (packet/byte counts) and allowing
> >> attributes from the vlan draft would shed additional light 
> on the what
> >> specific services the user was consuming/using at a given 
> point in time.
> > 
> > Assume that you carry the User-Priority-Table within 
> Accounting-Request 
> > messages. Do you think that it provides information how 
> many packets are 
> > carried for each individual QoS class? Where is the 
> information that 
> > offers me the following info:
> > - # packets/bytes for user priority 0
> > ....
> > - # packets/bytes for user priority 7
> > 
> > Ciao
> > Hannes
> > 
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> MS
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>